Ever wondered why the Industrial Revolution—the era that gave us steam engines, factories, and, let’s be honest, a whole lot of smoke—started in Britain and not in places like the Netherlands, France, Spain, China, or India? If you’re a history geek (or just history-curious), you’ve probably asked yourself that at least once.

Let’s talk about today’s sponsor, our friend that does HR news

The best HR advice comes from people who’ve been in the trenches.

That’s what this newsletter delivers.

I Hate it Here is your insider’s guide to surviving and thriving in HR, from someone who’s been there. It’s not about theory or buzzwords — it’s about practical, real-world advice for navigating everything from tricky managers to messy policies.

Every newsletter is written by Hebba Youssef — a Chief People Officer who’s seen it all and is here to share what actually works (and what doesn’t). We’re talking real talk, real strategies, and real support — all with a side of humor to keep you sane.

Because HR shouldn’t feel like a thankless job. And you shouldn’t feel alone in it.

Sign Up Free

Let’s break it down together.

First off, Britain had a secret weapon: coal. Tons of it. And not just buried deep underground, but right where people needed it. This cheap, accessible energy source was the fuel that powered those early steam engines and factories. Compare that to China, which also had coal, but it was way too far from the main cities to be practical.

But coal wasn’t the only thing Britain had going for it. Wages were pretty high, so inventors and business folks had a big incentive to come up with machines that could do the work cheaper and faster than people. That’s how you get the spinning jenny and the steam engine—not just cool names, but actual game changers.

Let’s not forget the Agricultural Revolution. Before factories, British farmers were already shaking things up with new crops, better tools, and smarter farming techniques. This meant more food, which meant more people, which meant more workers for those new factories (and more customers to buy all the stuff being made).

Britain was also pretty stable politically. Property rights were protected, and the government was generally supportive of business and innovation. If you had a bright idea, you could get a patent and maybe even some investment. That wasn’t always the case in France or Spain, where politics could get, well, a little dramatic.

Speaking of investment, Britain had a solid banking system. Entrepreneurs could actually get loans to build factories and try out new inventions. Plus, the British Empire was massive, so there were plenty of markets to sell to and raw materials to import.

Now, why not the other guys? The Netherlands was rich and clever, but focused more on trade and finance than heavy industry—and didn’t have the same coal resources. France had resources and brains, but internal tariffs, less accessible coal, and a more controlling government slowed things down. Spain was busy with its colonies and didn’t invest much in local industry. China and India? Both had big populations and lots of skills, but their economies and governments weren’t set up to encourage the kind of risky, entrepreneurial innovation that took off in Britain.

So what can you, as a history lover, take away from all this? The Industrial Revolution wasn’t inevitable. It happened in Britain because of a unique mix of resources, incentives, and social conditions. Change one piece of the puzzle, and the whole story could have played out somewhere else—or not at all.

If you enjoyed this little trip through history’s “what ifs,” why not help us keep the conversation going? Support historygonebananas by subscribing to our newsletter and following us on social media. Let’s make history fun, together!